Alliance with U.P.K

plazayo · Post by **plazayo** » Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:44 am

What do you guys think about an alliance?

Post by **eXg. Suyko** » Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:14 am

voted no, dont know any of you

Puddle · Post by **Puddle** » Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:42 pm

@plazayo, an alliance must be beneficial to both parties. unfortunately, in this case, i believe it is too lopsided based on rankings/points.

U.P.K
alliance rank 73
members 39
total points 417.391
points per member 10.702

Yeti · Post by **Yeti** » Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:40 pm

Nothing against them but I've voted no on this. I'm with Puddle it too lopsided. Would we gain anything from it ?

plazayo · Post by **plazayo** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:27 am

We may be low ranked but we have alot of resorces and most of our players comand a very large fleet.

Post by **eXg. Suyko** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:01 am

plazayo wrote:We may be low ranked but we have alot of resorces and most of our players comand a very large fleet.

lol....define large

plazayo · Post by **plazayo** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:42 pm

I THINK SOME OF OUR PLAYER COMAND AS MANY AS ANYWHERE FROM 100 TO 1000 SHIPS

eXg. Ersatz · Post by **eXg. Ersatz** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:48 pm

No need for all caps man.

eXg. Phenom · Post by **eXg. Phenom** » Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:48 pm

plazayo wrote:I THINK SOME OF OUR PLAYER COMAND AS MANY AS ANYWHERE FROM 100 TO 1000 SHIPS

what type of ships?
send me a message in ogame.

Post by **SunTzu** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 4:41 am

Post by **eXg. Pun1sher** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 6:40 am

plazayo, I appreciate you taking the time to come to our forums, which are much better than the IN game messaging system. Many times people contact us in game, but never make the rest of the effort in coming here. Perhaps the vote might have been a little premature, but you have to start somewhere.

Generally speaking, the EXG Alliance doesn't ally or NAP with any other Alliances, unless there is are mutual gains. Points, fleets, and experience/dedication do come into play. Now I think that we should further investigate this, as I"m not sure we know much about your alliance yet. Our wing is also very commited to the game, and opens other options as well.

PuN

RA\/ID · Post by **RA\/ID** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:35 pm

I gotta say no... they simply have too many other allies. Of which incluude SDS_TW (post war + a HUGE alliance)
E.V.I.L
PDS
HGD
S.I
U.A
N.A.Q
DMM
USC

as welll as pacts with
SERB AO (I dun like them but I cant speak for the whole alliance)
SDS
P42 (def dont like...I personally had heated relations)
P42_TW(same as above ^)
BKB (HUGE alliance and many raids)
NSA_GAF

a lot of these are both raiding and cold enemy targets...The last thing I would want is to get tied up in these alignments or force your alliance into a decision making spot where you would have to choose b/w two allies. Not to mention with all your allies together it takes a lot of HUGE profitable areas out. If we hit our usual raids your allies may try to pressure you. Now I understand the seek for strong allies but I fear you may have come knocking at the wrong door my friend. We tend to make too many enemies, and frankly I'm afraid that your 1000 ship fleets wont help us the way we would need it too.

eXg. Ersatz · Post by **eXg. Ersatz** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:34 pm

As leader of the wing, I am going to be as blount as possible. We were in a war with SDS_TW I dont think an allinace with the wing would help either. We dont like to alliance with big alliance.

plazayo · Post by **plazayo** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:10 pm

The leader of my alliance would like me to tell you that many of our players are in the top 1000. We have 40 members all growing very fast. THE PRESIDENT ALSO HAS MANY POWERFUL CONTACTS WHO ALSO COME TO HIS AID IN THE TIME OF NEED.
ALLIE STATUS WOULD ALSO BE GOOD AS THE U.P.K ARE A VERY WELL KNOWN ALLIANCE IN UNI 12

eXg. Ersatz · Post by **eXg. Ersatz** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:17 pm

Like I said before, no need for all caps man.

Alliance with U.P.K

Should we have an alliance with U.P.K?

Alliance with U.P.K