Intel Core 17 performance

Something about anything goes here.
Post Reply
eXg. Jago-Vs-Fulgore

Intel Core 17 performance

Post by eXg. Jago-Vs-Fulgore »

:idea:
"This is why project gears has been belayed til the end of the month"
:idea:





Intel has been unchallenged on the desktop and laptop front since launching the Core architecture in 2006. The Core architecture trounced AMD at the high-end, forcing the Phenom manufacturer to fight back with aggressive value pricing. For the better part of two years, AMD has struggled to compete with Intel's mainstream processors, leaving the performance and extreme categories completely unchallenged for Intel. Now with the release of Intel's newest Core i7 CPU and the Express X58 chipset, the gap widens ever further.
Image

The Core i7 CPU lineup will be released in three flavors: Core i7-965 Extreme Edition, Core i7-940, and Core i7-920. All of the processors will arrive with four CPU cores, Hyper-Threading, 8MB of L3 cache, and they will be built on Intel's 45nm manufacturing process. All of the processors will run on a 1066MHz front-side bus. The 965 Extreme Edition will run at 3.2GHz, and like other Extreme Edition processors, it will come with an unlocked multiplier that allows for easier overclocking. Intel's Core i7-940 and Core i7-920 will run at 2.93GHz and 2.66GHz, respectively. The new CPU architecture brings with it a new LGA 1366 socket; older LGA775 motherboards that supported the Core 2 CPUs won't be compatible with the Core i7.

Like the other Extreme Edition processors before it, the Core i7-965 will cost $1,000. The Core i7-940 and Core i7-920 will cost $562 and $284, respectively.

The return of Hyper-Threading might be a surprise to some. We haven't seen Hyper-Threading on a CPU since the Pentium 4 days. Intel left the feature out of the original Core architecture but decided to bring it back in the Core i7. Similar to the original technology, Hyper-Threading in i7 gives each core a second executable thread, which gives the operating system the impression that it has a total of eight processing cores.

The biggest features to come with the new CPU architecture and chipset, aside from Hyper-Threading, are the Quick Path Interconnect (QPI) and an integrated memory controller. AMD has had an integrated memory controller for ages, and now Intel has finally gotten around to adopting it. The Core i7 CPUs will come with an on-die three-channel memory controller. The built-in memory controller reduces latency and adds a tremendous amount of memory bandwidth that allows the Core i7 to better feed its cores.

The QPI is basically the interface that the CPU uses to communicate with the motherboard chipset; a rough equivalent would be AMD's HyperTransport. QPI will function at 6.4GT/s on the Core i7-940 and at 4.8GT/s on both the Core i7-940 and Core i7-920.

Other features of note include new SSE4.2 instructions, better branch prediction, improved loop streaming, additional caching hierarchy, faster virtualization, deep buffers, and improved lock support. Combined, the improvements lead to more efficient performance on a clock-for-clock and per-watt basis.

Intel's Express X58 chipset, and the accompanying DX58SO motherboard that uses the chipset, comes with numerous improvements. The board comes with six SATA ports, two eSATA ports, two 1394a ports, 12 USB 2.0 ports, onboard Intel High Definition Audio, and dual PCI Express slots capable of ATI CrossFire. The motherboard supports three channels of DDR3-1333 memory but comes with four slots for RAM. To make the best use of the motherboard, we recommend populating three of the slots and keeping the fourth empty.

We decided to test the Core i7 against Intel's eight-core dual CPU Skulltrail setup. The matchup is about as close as we can get to a competitor for the Core i7. Skulltrail should have an advantage with its eight real cores, but we found that the Core i7-965 beat on our old high-end setup mercilessly in our head-to-head tests.

Image

The Core i7-965wins Valve's particle test by a wide margin, and even the slower 2.66GHz Core i7-920 manages to outperform the dual-CPU 3.2GHz Skulltrail. The fact that a $300 CPU comes close to outperforming two former flagship processors that once cost a combined $2000 reminds us of how much we love the pace of innovation in the microprocessor market. Lost Planet's Cave Test further demonstrates the superiority of the Core i7, as both of the new CPUs leave Skulltrail behind by forty and sixty frames per second. In our custom simultaneous video encode and Crysis test, the Core i7-965 finished the encode almost a full minute ahead of the Skulltrail and managed to get an extra 10 frames per second on Crysis. The slower Core i7-920 didn't quite keep up with Skulltrail, but it came close.

Intel's done a marvelous job with the Core i7, a feat made even more impressive by the fact that the company is largely competing with itself. The Core i7 CPUs provide outstanding performance gains over processors based on the original Core architecture. Be on the lookout for the new CPUs later this November.

System Setup: Intel Core i7-965, Intel Core i7-920, Intel DX58SO, 3GB Qimonda DDR3 RAM, Intel SATA SSD X25-M 80GB. Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775, Intel D5400XS, 4GB FB-DIMM (2x2GB), 3GB Corsair XMS Memory (1GBx2)(2x512MB), 750GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA Hard Disk Drive. Windows Vista 32-bit. GeForce GTX 280. Video card driver: beta Forceware 180.42.
User avatar
=southern firestorm=
Forum Groupie
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:28 pm
Location: Fredericton New Brunswick
Contact:

Post by =southern firestorm= »

i must say this i am one of the few that like amd more then intel but that my input.
Image
(judment day is coming soon for those who put darkness in lights eyes)
eXg. Jago-Vs-Fulgore

Post by eXg. Jago-Vs-Fulgore »

=southern firestorm= wrote:i must say this i am one of the few that like amd more then intel but that my input.
HEy.. i feel you man. I use to be a complete Amd fan boy.. Still wear the Amd shirt i have to the gym & omg i've owned about 12 different amd processors.. No lie.. Intel is some Con's man.. How the hell a $300 dollor Core i7 processor is gonna out perform 2 Qx9770's in skulltrail :?:

*Bullshit* i know ppl are pissed that invested over $2000 after tax on those processors & not to mention that $500 dollor motherboard intel took complete advantage of ppl with that was already spending $2000 bucks on that overated Extreme processor... "Extremem these nutz intel.. I've owned a Qx9650 for months now & all i can say is =BLAH=& eat ur heart out E8400 :wink: but its all good.. i paid for my lesson & it wont happen again.. 8) ..

Almost the same feelings guys had that spent $600 bucks on a 9800gx2 just to find out 5 months later that the Gtx280 would out preform it at 400 to 300 bucks less cash.. Bastards.. i say just look around & judge if you want to upgrade based off the up coming games ur really, really looking forward to...
& even that works sometimes & sometimes it dont.. cant win for losing fuckng around with these Hardware companys :?

"CAN I GET A AMEN" :?: :x
User avatar
eXg. Phenom
Open Roster
Posts: 3464
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado
Contact:

Post by eXg. Phenom »

Lol I wanted to be a noob and say
"thats why I dont use Intel or AMD, I use ____"

but, after looking up the alternatives, I only found uber nuber CPU's

Cyrix - a bunch of 5 year old's making chips in the basement
IBM - If you want a cash register as a computer
Motorola - Ring Ring, my computer is telling me someone is calling me
Image
dorkiz
Quake Live US
Posts: 3197
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:31 pm
Location: SLC, Utah
Contact:

Post by dorkiz »

You know... I've always been an AMD fan for ages, but I do have to give Intel some credit for the past couple of years. But this is always the cycle. AMD will struggle, and when they catch up and surpass Intel will be stuck with their thumbs up their asses for 5 years, and then they make a comeback for 2-3 years, and it repeats. So... They are doing some real innovative s**t, and my next purchase may very well be an Intel, but I'm still AMD at heart.
Image
eXg. Jago-Vs-Fulgore

Post by eXg. Jago-Vs-Fulgore »

eXg. dorkiz wrote:You know... I've always been an AMD fan for ages, but I do have to give Intel some credit for the past couple of years. But this is always the cycle. AMD will struggle, and when they catch up and surpass Intel will be stuck with their thumbs up their asses for 5 years, and then they make a comeback for 2-3 years, and it repeats. So... They are doing some real innovative s**t, and my next purchase may very well be an Intel, but I'm still AMD at heart.
I agree with ya there.. Its like i'll play my ps3 & xbox 360 more than anything.. but am a Sega fan to heart
User avatar
=southern firestorm=
Forum Groupie
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:28 pm
Location: Fredericton New Brunswick
Contact:

Post by =southern firestorm= »

eXg. Jago-Vs-Spinal wrote:
=southern firestorm= wrote:i must say this i am one of the few that like amd more then intel but that my input.
HEy.. i feel you man. I use to be a complete Amd fan boy.. Still wear the Amd shirt i have to the gym & omg i've owned about 12 different amd processors.. No lie.. Intel is some Con's man.. How the hell a $300 dollor Core i7 processor is gonna out perform 2 Qx9770's in skulltrail :?:

*Bullshit* i know ppl are pissed that invested over $2000 after tax on those processors & not to mention that $500 dollor motherboard intel took complete advantage of ppl with that was already spending $2000 bucks on that overated Extreme processor... "Extremem these nutz intel.. I've owned a Qx9650 for months now & all i can say is =BLAH=& eat ur heart out E8400 :wink: but its all good.. i paid for my lesson & it wont happen again.. 8) ..

Almost the same feelings guys had that spent $600 bucks on a 9800gx2 just to find out 5 months later that the Gtx280 would out preform it at 400 to 300 bucks less cash.. Bastards.. i say just look around & judge if you want to upgrade based off the up coming games ur really, really looking forward to...
& even that works sometimes & sometimes it dont.. cant win for losing fuckng around with these Hardware companys :?

"CAN I GET A AMEN" :?: :x
agreeed iv used a few intel processers b4 they suck like hell i find intel trys to biuld fast ones but they 1 dont last long 2 there made with cheep parts that tend to slow down well iv had my amd processer for about 1 year and now i swar by it!
Image
(judment day is coming soon for those who put darkness in lights eyes)
User avatar
BugZz
Forum eXtremist
Posts: 3559
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Oberlin,Ohio

Post by BugZz »

im happy with my build q6600 is enough power to run all my games maxed. gx2's is enough pow
[CENTER]Image[/CENTER]
User avatar
eXg. Mezzfit
Forum Bot
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:53 pm
Location: Monroe, LA

Post by eXg. Mezzfit »

Yeah... I saw somewhere about Intel's plans and after this gen there's a 32nm approaching. Suuuuper!
Image
Image
Image
Damn, I was blinded by science.
Post Reply

Return to “General Public Chat”