Page 7 of 9

Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 6:03 pm
by simulation
Finally remembered to run 3DMark06 and got 11927

ASUS P5E
Intel Q6600 2.4GHz
XFX 8800GT AlphaDog 1950MHz
8GB PC-6400 RAM

Vista-64 with SP1 RC1

No tweaks or O/C

Image

Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:15 pm
by simulation
Just ran the tests in XP-64 and got a score of 12282. Not much of a difference, and my Vista install was after a full install of my usual software and tools whereas the XP install is totally clean with just drivers.

Sim

Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 6:24 pm
by BugZz
Image
Image

Hellllls yeah

Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 1:02 am
by eXg. Mezzfit
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7875908

15725 in 3dmark06 bitches.... My highest score yet. and I'm gonna keep tweaking for higher. new 3dmark vantage score to follow

Update: P8941 marks in the new vantage 3dmark. Not bad :wink:

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:25 am
by eXg. Pheon1x
This seems alittle low for my spec's....what do u guys think?

Image

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 8:22 am
by eXg. focus
eXg. Pheon1x wrote:This seems alittle low for my spec's....what do u guys think?

Image
Actually, it kind of does. I was expecting it to be around 7500. Soo.. I'd assume if you still have the 1gb of ram that's a factor, and the CPU is a bit of a bottleneck. That 8800 should have carried you higher though.

Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:32 am
by eXg. Pheon1x
eXg. focus wrote:
eXg. Pheon1x wrote:This seems alittle low for my spec's....what do u guys think?

Image
Actually, it kind of does. I was expecting it to be around 7500. Soo.. I'd assume if you still have the 1gb of ram that's a factor, and the CPU is a bit of a bottleneck. That 8800 should have carried you higher though.
when i was at qc the guys that where sitting behind us where doin this test..and i asked then what mine should be i told them my specs and they where expecting 8-10k with just the 1gig

now i have 2gigs (and everything is the same)
i was erxpecting like 9k or so on this test and got nowhere close as u can see...


does any1 have any idea y i scored so low?
:? :?

Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 10:27 am
by eXg. focus
you're not going to get 8-10k with that CPU.

Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 5:38 pm
by eXg. Pheon1x
eXg. focus wrote:you're not going to get 8-10k with that CPU.
alrighty

!?!?!?

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:50 am
by eXg. Mezzfit
Holy butt nuggets! With the new proc I got
18933 in 06 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8283420
p13973 in vantage http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=399271

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:30 am
by eXg. focus
you got it working? Did it just start right up when you got home? Man that had me nervous

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:09 pm
by eXg. Mezzfit
Yeah I took the CMOS battery off and waited like 30 mintues. Turned it on without the battery to clear it. Then power right up. and @ 4.25 mHz lol

Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:46 pm
by eXg. focus
eXg. Mezzfit wrote:Yeah I took the CMOS battery off and waited like 30 mintues. Turned it on without the battery to clear it. Then power right up. and @ 4.25 mHz lol
I told you to take that battery out! but noooo "my fancy mobo has this button, it's the same thing".

:P

glad it's workin now though man. phew

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 6:00 pm
by eXg. focus

Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:16 pm
by eXg. focus
UPDATE PEOPLE!