Intel finally kicks AMD's ass(sets).........

K1LLA:4:H1RE · Post by **K1LLA:4:H1RE** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:37 pm

Friday when I saw the first set of independent benchmark results pitting a mid-end Intel E6600 "Conroe" 2.4 GHz CPU (due next month) against the just released flagship extreme edition AMD FX-62 CPU, I started wondering if AMD worst nightmare was coming true. Intel's ~$250 E6600 CPU annihilated AMD's ~$1000 Extreme Edition AM2 based FX-62! This effectively means that AMD's flagship desktop performance CPU will be obsolete by the end of next month when Intel released the CPUs codenamed Conroe. The 2.4 GHz Conroe E6600 CPU is a 65 watt part while Intel's Extreme Edition Conroe CPU will operate at 2.93 GHz and still be 40 watts lower than AMD's FX-62 which runs at 120 watt TPD. AMD's power advantage over Intel's current Pentium 4 NetBurst architecture just vanished in to thin air with the introduction of Intel's Core 2 architecture next month.......

View the whole story here:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/index.php?p=240&tag=nl.e550

eXg. Wicked · Post by **eXg. Wicked** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:00 pm

ouch time for amd now.
And i just bought a x2 4400 rofl!!!

eXg. Frag///aster · Post by **eXg. Frag///aster** » Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:41 pm

Refuse to believe it for now... will get back to you... Time to toilet paper INTEL headquaters....

Frag.

Post by **eXg. CrUsH** » Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:42 pm

I go pee pee on Intel....

eXg. focus · Post by **eXg. focus** » Tue Jun 06, 2006 10:44 pm

eXg. CrUsH wrote:I go pee pee on Intel....

Ruiner · Post by **Ruiner** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:32 am

eXg. CrUsH wrote:I go pee pee on Intel....

same... and your ati card

K1LLA:4:H1RE · Post by **K1LLA:4:H1RE** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 3:23 am

im serious guys... go and read the blog... this link was posted....

benchmarks were done and proven...

with the new mid-range 250.00 Intel chip coming out, it wooped AMD FX-62's ass....

now we dont even know how the top-range (extreme edition) Intel chip will perform...

eXg. focus · Post by **eXg. focus** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 3:39 am

yeah, i read it...

I swear to god, if it's true, I'm gonna build another pc. I'm not kidding. I'll just have two.. I'm serious.

Post by **eXg. CrUsH** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:03 am

eXg. Ruiner wrote:
eXg. CrUsH wrote:I go pee pee on Intel....
same... and your ati card

Dude youve been away for too long. I built a new system already! 7900 GT CO Super clock mang! 550mhz 1580mhz woooo!

eXg. focus · Post by **eXg. focus** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:09 pm

ya, one of these..

One of the most powerful single video cards on the market today.

Post by **eXg. CrUsH** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 12:32 pm

Yeah and when I have it clocked at 587mhz for core and 1697 for memory it owns face in mark 06!

Ruiner · Post by **Ruiner** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 1:10 pm

lol, ok

eXg. sabooya · Post by **eXg. sabooya** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:22 pm

ALL WRONG!
http://www.gdhardware.com/hardware/cpus ... oe/001.htm
Yes Intel may have beaten them, but only by 17% TAHT NOTHING!!!!!!
It shoudl have scored double, AT LEAST 30% Its a quad processor for crying out loud...
Intel is not worth it for the price, Ill just overclock a AMD...

Post by **eXg. Pun1sher** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:42 pm

Oh great, JUST got the FX-60 running.

PuN

eXg. sabooya · Post by **eXg. sabooya** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:08 am

eXg. Pun1sher wrote:Oh great, JUST got the FX-60 running.

PuN

just overclock it to the fx62 speeds