COD5 returning to World War 2
COD5 returning to World War 2
Sigh . I wasnt at all happy about this when i first heard it. But then again i couldnt blame them & got to guessing them making this move back to World War 2 certainly means they feel they can Reinvent that war in a better aspect, than they have in the past/
They did a great job on Cod4 & there for i have faith in what they'll do next
http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-news/3237.html
They did a great job on Cod4 & there for i have faith in what they'll do next
http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-news/3237.html
Last edited by eXg. Jago-Vs-Fulgore on Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- eXg. Mezzfit
- Forum Bot
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:53 pm
- Location: Monroe, LA
- eXg. Phenom
- Open Roster
- Posts: 3464
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:22 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado
- Contact:
jago, i hate to break this to you, but infinity ward isn't developing cod5. treyarch is doing cod5. treyarch's last game was cod3. sure they are using cod4's engine, but treyarch has a lot to prove in terms of being able to maintain the level that infinity ward produces. so yeah, not much hope that cod5 is going to be very good.
better to be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and erase all doubt.
- eXg. Phenom
- Open Roster
- Posts: 3464
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:22 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado
- Contact:
- eXg. Mezzfit
- Forum Bot
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:53 pm
- Location: Monroe, LA
because no developer can make a great game every year. if you want examples of great games that take time -- cod4 (2 year lag between cod2 and cod4), mgs4 (if that is your thing, but it was in development for like 3 years), halo3 (3 years), grand theft auto 4 (3 years), any blizzard game (infinity + 1 years, there is a funny list out there of how blizzard defines time, but i can't find it). so what activision decided to do, and it is a brilliant business move, was to acquire a second studio and have that second studio and iw switch off every other year. that way activision can continue to put out new cods every year. the thought was that it would give each developer 2 years to work on their next version, but sadly treyarch gets shafted and keeps having to use the new iw engine each time and so only gets about one year of dev time.eXg. Phenom wrote:Question:
This had happened before, where Infinity Ward hasn't been the maker of one of the Cod games. Why are they letting other people make them?
oh well, cod5 will be a down year and then hopefully cod6 is good. we'll see.
an example of a game that sucks because it is made every year -- madden.
better to be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and erase all doubt.
- eXg. Phenom
- Open Roster
- Posts: 3464
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:22 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado
- Contact:
Yay! Someone who knows what he's talking about lol.. getting tired of hearing the same old "cod5 is gonna own" across every forum I read.eXg. supercat1 wrote:jago, i hate to break this to you, but infinity ward isn't developing cod5. treyarch is doing cod5. treyarch's last game was cod3. sure they are using cod4's engine, but treyarch has a lot to prove in terms of being able to maintain the level that infinity ward produces. so yeah, not much hope that cod5 is going to be very good.
I have cod3 for 360, and it's fun for messing around in, but not even close to what I would call a good game.
- eXg. Shedao Shai
- Counter-Strike Source
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:18 pm
- Location: Greenville, NC
eXg. supercat1 wrote:because no developer can make a great game every year. if you want examples of great games that take time -- cod4 (2 year lag between cod2 and cod4), mgs4 (if that is your thing, but it was in development for like 3 years), halo3 (3 years), grand theft auto 4 (3 years), any blizzard game (infinity + 1 years, there is a funny list out there of how blizzard defines time, but i can't find it). so what activision decided to do, and it is a brilliant business move, was to acquire a second studio and have that second studio and iw switch off every other year. that way activision can continue to put out new cods every year. the thought was that it would give each developer 2 years to work on their next version, but sadly treyarch gets shafted and keeps having to use the new iw engine each time and so only gets about one year of dev time.eXg. Phenom wrote:Question:
This had happened before, where Infinity Ward hasn't been the maker of one of the Cod games. Why are they letting other people make them?
oh well, cod5 will be a down year and then hopefully cod6 is good. we'll see.
an example of a game that sucks because it is made every year -- madden.
well thats just great.. wonder if they going to make 1 mistake they made last time... cod5 does not come on the pc... they did it with cod3
I think they should do something totally un-American (government and their sytle) and do s**t that everyone always wonders about. Put up squads of Army Rangers, Navy Seals, Brit SAS, etc and have them all fight each other. Woooo. Haha. And sure, throw in a few stupid Marines.
I was thinking about it when I played COD4 SP the other day... Why the f**k are Marines doing missions with a group of SAS? That is the biggest unrealistic thing I found in the game. :/
I was thinking about it when I played COD4 SP the other day... Why the f**k are Marines doing missions with a group of SAS? That is the biggest unrealistic thing I found in the game. :/
that would be interesting to see. i'm no big military nut (my roommate is) but i would really like to see those elite soldiers go at it in a simulated combat environment. lazer tag ftw!eXg. dorkiz wrote:I think they should do something totally un-American (government and their sytle) and do s**t that everyone always wonders about. Put up squads of Army Rangers, Navy Seals, Brit SAS, etc and have them all fight each other. Woooo. Haha. And sure, throw in a few stupid Marines.
I was thinking about it when I played COD4 SP the other day... Why the f**k are Marines doing missions with a group of SAS? That is the biggest unrealistic thing I found in the game. :/
better to be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and erase all doubt.